Meta-Analysis: Diagnostic test accuracy, Bivariate model (Moses-Littenberg model)

Home Significance tests Meta-analysis Puzzles About Contact

Here you can conduct meta-analysis of results of studies conducting diagnostic test accuracy: Available data = True Positives, False Negatives, False Positives, True Negatives

Formula used and other details
Number of studies to be included in the meta-analysis
Model type
Correction (0.5 is added)
Confidence level %
In percentage. Commonly used values are 90, 95, 99. 		%
Please enter the finding of each included study in the side box. Please use one row for one study.

The sequence should be Study ID (Author et al etc), True positives (positive index test results amongst diseased), False negatives (negative index test results amongst diseased), False positives (positive index test results amongst non-diseased), True negatives (negative index test results amongst non-diseased) Please do not include any space, comma or tab "within" studyID (for example, please do not use "John 2009" or "John, 2009", instead use "John2009" or "John_2009".

You can also copy and paste the data from other files such as excel etc, maintaining the sequence.
StudyID True Diseased (Reference test positive) True Non-diseased (Reference test negative)
True Positives (Index test positive) False negative (Index test negative) False positive (Index test positive) True negative (Index test negative)